<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sankey Diagrams &#187; electricity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/tag/electricity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com</link>
	<description>A Sankey diagram says more than 1000 pie charts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What goes up, must come down!</title>
		<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/what-goes-up-must-come-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/what-goes-up-must-come-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phineas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	For most Sankey diagrams I find when browsing the web, a &#8216;left-to-right&#8217; or &#8216;bottom-to-top&#8217; orientation prevails. &#8216;Top-to-bottom&#8217; is less common, but there are also examples like <a href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/efficiency-diagram-for-ship-engines/">this one</a>. </p>
<p>A rather untypical shape for a Sankey diagram has been up on the <a href="http://www.e-sankey.com/de">German page of the e!Sankey webpage</a>. </p>
<div class="mypicsgallery"><a rel="lightbox[e_sankey_031]" href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/e_sankey_031/pumped_storage.png"  title="Sankey diagram of a "Pumpspeicheranlage" (pumpeds storage power plant as shown on http://www.e-sankey.com/de"><img  width="500" height="330" src="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/e_sankey_031/tumbs/tmb_pumped_storage.png" alt="Sankey diagram of a "Pumpspeicheranlage" (pumpeds storage power plant as shown on http://www.e-sankey.com/de" title="Sankey diagram of a "Pumpspeicheranlage" (pumpeds storage power plant as shown on http://www.e-sankey.com/de" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbsnav"></div>
<p>It shows the energy balance for a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity">pumped storage power plant</a> as a curved shape, with the energy input at the left leg, and the energy that can be recovered (77,3%) at the right one. </p>
<blockquote><p>Energy is stored &#8220;in the form of water, pumped from a lower elevation reservoir to a higher elevation. Low-cost off-peak electric power is used to run the pumps. During periods of high electrical demand, the stored water is released through turbines. Although the losses of the pumping process makes the plant a net consumer of energy overall, the system increases revenue by selling more electricity during periods of peak demand, when electricity prices are highest. Pumped storage is the largest-capacity form of grid energy storage now available.&#8221; (Wikipedia)</p></blockquote>
<p>I searched for the original Sankey diagram in the source given (Quaschning 2007) and <a href="http://www.volker-quaschning.de/klima2000/Kapitel6.html">found this text</a> with the diagram in chapter 6.1.2. That diagram already featured the curvy shape, and has just been reproduced similarly.</p>
<div class="mypicsgallery"><a rel="lightbox[o_sankey_059]" href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_059/quaschning2.png"  title="Sankey diagram for a pumped storage hydro plant. Source: http://www.volker-quaschning.de/klima2000/Kapitel6.html"><img  width="500" height="334" src="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_059/tumbs/tmb_quaschning2.png" alt="Sankey diagram for a pumped storage hydro plant. Source: http://www.volker-quaschning.de/klima2000/Kapitel6.html" title="Sankey diagram for a pumped storage hydro plant. Source: http://www.volker-quaschning.de/klima2000/Kapitel6.html" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbsnav"></div>
<p>The use of the curve layout seems justified here. The author chose it to point out the difference in altitude. The upper basin is at the apex of the curve. Water pumped up from the lower basin requires energy, which can partly be recovered when the water runs down again. </p>
<p>What goes up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/what-goes-up-must-come-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utility / Nonutility Sankey for Electricity</title>
		<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/utility-nonutility-sankey-for-electricity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/utility-nonutility-sankey-for-electricity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phineas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonutility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/utility-nonutility-sankey-for-electricity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOEs Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces a lot of energy statistics, and they often use Sankey diagrams to illustrate energy flows. One of their Sankey diagrams that dates back to 1999 has an interesting two-part structure. It actually is made up from two Sankey diagrams, which are connected by one flow. Values are in quadrillion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	<a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/">DOEs Energy Information Administration (EIA)</a> produces a lot of energy statistics, and they often use Sankey diagrams to illustrate energy flows.</p>
<p>One of their Sankey diagrams that dates back to 1999 has an interesting two-part structure. It actually is made up from two Sankey diagrams, which are connected by one flow. Values are in quadrillion <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_thermal_unit">BTUs</a>.</p>
<div class="mypicsgallery"><a rel="lightbox[o_sankey_016]" href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_016/energy_flows_incl_nonutility.jpg"  title="A Sankey diagram for energy production in the US 1999 showing the quantities created by utilities and by nonutility power producers. Values are in Quadrillion BTUs. Diagram originally from http://www.eia.doe.gov"><img  width="500" height="283" src="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_016/tumbs/tmb_energy_flows_incl_nonutility.jpg" alt="A Sankey diagram for energy production in the US 1999 showing the quantities created by utilities and by nonutility power producers. Values are in Quadrillion BTUs. Diagram originally from http://www.eia.doe.gov" title="A Sankey diagram for energy production in the US 1999 showing the quantities created by utilities and by nonutility power producers. Values are in Quadrillion BTUs. Diagram originally from http://www.eia.doe.gov" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbsnav"></div>
<p>The top part of the diagram shows electricity produced from various sources, losses along the production line, and the consumption of the electricity in the &#8220;Residential&#8221;, &#8220;Commercial&#8221; and &#8220;Industrial&#8221; sectors. This is structured very similarly to other Sankey diagrams EIA publishes annually (<a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/aer/pdf/pages/sec1_3.pdf">example</a>).</p>
<p>The bottom part shows another Sankey diagram for electricity produced by &#8216;Nonutility Power Producers&#8217;.  So what exactly are these NPPs?</p>
<blockquote><p>A corporation, person, agency, authority, or other legal entity or instrumentality that owns electric generating capacity and is not an electric utility. Nonutility power producers include qualifying cogenerators, qualifying small power producers, and other nonutility generators (including independent power producers) without a designated franchised service area, and which do not file forms listed in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 18, Part 141. (<a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/infosheets/elecpwrgen.html">Source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Half of the electricity produced by Nonutility Power Producers in 1999 was fed into the grid, while the other half was consumed on-site. I imagine these are typically larger industrial facilities, that have their own power generation. The fact that nuclear energy   appears in this section does irritates me a little bit, but as <a href="http://allcountries.org/uscensus/971_nonutility_electric_power_producers_summary_by.html">this page explains</a>, the reason is probably a nuclear reactor in a national research laboratory, that is accounted for here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/utility-nonutility-sankey-for-electricity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
