<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sankey Diagrams &#187; natural gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/tag/natural-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com</link>
	<description>A Sankey diagram says more than 1000 pie charts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sankey Diagram for Regasifier Plant</title>
		<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/sankey-diagram-for-regasifier-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/sankey-diagram-for-regasifier-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phineas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	<a href="http://powerservices.lakho.com/2009/06/25/consider-chp-for-lng-vaporization/">This post</a> on the <a href="http://powerservices.lakho.com/">Power Industry News blog</a> features a Sankey diagram &#8220;for a dual Brayton cycle regasifier plant [that] shows how the fuel is consumed&#8221;. The article describes possibilities of improving the energy efficiency of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) reevaporation process.</p>
<div class="mypicsgallery"><a rel="lightbox[o_sankey_079]" href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_079/power industry news Sankey regasifier plant.JPG"  title="Sankey diagram for a dual Brayton cycle regasifier plant from "Consider CHP for LNG Vaporization" on Power Industry News blog (http://powerservices.lakho.com/2009/06/25/consider-chp-for-lng-vaporization/)"><img  width="500" height="426" src="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_079/tumbs/tmb_power industry news Sankey regasifier plant.JPG" alt="Sankey diagram for a dual Brayton cycle regasifier plant from "Consider CHP for LNG Vaporization" on Power Industry News blog (http://powerservices.lakho.com/2009/06/25/consider-chp-for-lng-vaporization/)" title="Sankey diagram for a dual Brayton cycle regasifier plant from "Consider CHP for LNG Vaporization" on Power Industry News blog (http://powerservices.lakho.com/2009/06/25/consider-chp-for-lng-vaporization/)" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbsnav"></div>
<p>I quite liked the Sankey diagram for its simplicity, being to scale and color coding. The fact that the arrows for &#8220;process heat&#8221; and &#8220;stack loss&#8221; branch out in a slightly curvy way larger than 90° is uncommon, but hey, it gives the whole thing a special touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/sankey-diagram-for-regasifier-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Natural Gas Flow Sankey</title>
		<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/virginia-natural-gas-flow-sankey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/virginia-natural-gas-flow-sankey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phineas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research at Virgina Tech has a website on Virgina Energy Patterns and Trends (VETP). This summary page on natural gas features a Sankey diagram for natural gas flows in Virginia in 2005. Flows are in million cubic feet. Note that the division line between dry gas production (88.610 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 	<a href="http://www.energy.vt.edu/">The Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research</a> at Virgina Tech has a website on <a href="http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/index.asp">Virgina Energy Patterns and Trends (VETP)</a>.</p>
<p>This summary page on natural gas features a Sankey diagram for natural gas flows in Virginia in 2005.</p>
<div class="mypicsgallery"><a rel="lightbox[o_sankey_036]" href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_036/VA_NG_FlowDiagram2005.gif"  title="Virginia natural gas Sankey diagram for 2005 (from: http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/naturalgas/index.asp)"><img  width="500" height="477" src="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_036/tumbs/tmb_VA_NG_FlowDiagram2005.gif" alt="Virginia natural gas Sankey diagram for 2005 (from: http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/naturalgas/index.asp)" title="Virginia natural gas Sankey diagram for 2005 (from: http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/naturalgas/index.asp)" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbsnav"></div>
<p>Flows are in million cubic feet. Note that the division line between dry gas production (88.610 million cubic feet) and interstate imports (1.114.460 million cubic feet) overemphasizes VA&#8217;s own production. Also the magnitude of the &#8220;consumption&#8221; flow and &#8220;interstate exports&#8221; are not to scale, probably owed to the desire of the designer to be able to split up the consumption arrow into separate arrows. The transportation arrow is exaggerated, and would only be a thin line if to scale.</p>
<p>On the <a href="http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/coal/index.asp">VETP summary page for coal</a>, there is another interesting Sankey, also for 2005.</p>
<div class="mypicsgallery"><a rel="lightbox[o_sankey_037]" href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_037/VA_coal_FlowDiagram2005.gif"  title="Virginia coal flows Sankey diagram for 2005 (Source: http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/coal/index.asp)"><img  width="500" height="225" src="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/wp-content/myfotos/o_sankey_037/tumbs/tmb_VA_coal_FlowDiagram2005.gif" alt="Virginia coal flows Sankey diagram for 2005 (Source: http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/coal/index.asp)" title="Virginia coal flows Sankey diagram for 2005 (Source: http://www.energy.vt.edu/vept/coal/index.asp)" /></a></div>
<div class="thumbsnav"></div>
<p>The second one also has some pecularities: The Sankey arrows for imports (15.764 thousand short tons) and exports (21.288 thousand short tons) of coal are not to scale, neither are the losses/unaccounted coal flows 4.951 thousand short tons.</p>
<p>Reminder to self: If I find the time I&#8217;ll do these two diagrams properly and to scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/virginia-natural-gas-flow-sankey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
