<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is the money, honey?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/where-is-the-money-honey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/where-is-the-money-honey/</link>
	<description>A Sankey diagram says more than 1000 pie charts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:45:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DURCHEINANDER &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flüsse mit Gewicht</title>
		<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/where-is-the-money-honey/comment-page-1/#comment-14586</link>
		<dc:creator>DURCHEINANDER &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flüsse mit Gewicht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/?p=402#comment-14586</guid>
		<description>[...] Geniale Verknüpfung von Fluss und Tabelle! Where is the money, honey? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geniale Verknüpfung von Fluss und Tabelle! Where is the money, honey? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Rapp</title>
		<link>http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/where-is-the-money-honey/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Rapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sankey-diagrams.com/?p=402#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>Hi there Phineas,
Actually the research was not so bad, and I had even way more details than displayed here. The complicated thing was to decide what to group together, recalculate, and come up with explanation of each branch that will be more clear to people, rather than acronyms.
Fun stuff, as you suspected, referred to the happiness of the artist (myself) when he found the right way of displaying all these figures. But stay tuned, there will be more to come, probably this week. Same subject, same style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there Phineas,<br />
Actually the research was not so bad, and I had even way more details than displayed here. The complicated thing was to decide what to group together, recalculate, and come up with explanation of each branch that will be more clear to people, rather than acronyms.<br />
Fun stuff, as you suspected, referred to the happiness of the artist (myself) when he found the right way of displaying all these figures. But stay tuned, there will be more to come, probably this week. Same subject, same style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

